Readspace

03 Oct, 2008

Forgotten Book: Banned Books Week

Posted by: Susan In: Children's Lit

Bibliography:
Bannerman, Helen. 1899.  Little Black Sambo. London: Grant Richards.  Reprinted 2003 by HarperCollins. ISBN: 9780397300068

This week, in recognition of Banned Books Week, Patti wanted to recruit as many librarians as possible to blog about banned books and the freedom to read.  I thought about what I wanted to write about…I could write about banned books and the freedom to read in general.  I could write about well known books being banned, such as The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (racist) or Harry Potter series (witchcraft) or The Grapes of Wrath (profanity).  For a very compelling story of how Grapes of Wrath was not only banned, but burned in California, click here.  When I was surfing around the Internet, looking at different sites and reading lists of banned books, I came across Little Black Sambo.

Little Black Sambo is not great classic literature as many of the challenged and banned books are.  It is not a book with a timely or controversial message, as many of the recent challenged picture books are.  It is a book written over 100 years ago, by a mother for her children when she was visiting India.  She wanted a story that communicated a little about what an exotic place they were in but was also entertaining.  Sambo goes for a walk in the jungle, and meets a series of tigers, who threaten to eat him, but every time Sambo makes a deal with them, and gives them something he has in exchange–his red coat, his purple shoes, his green umbrella.  Later he hears the tigers fighting over all his things, and he gets them back, while the tigers are so angry and so bent on fighting each other, that they held on to each other’s tail and chased each other faster and faster till they melted away into a pool of butter which Sambo scooped up and took home to his mother who put it on pancakes for dinner.

The story itself is quite innocent and fun.  The problems that many have with this book are its portrayal of Sambo and his family as picanninys, racial caricatures of African Americans, even though the story and the family were Indian, not African.  The names, Sambo, Mumbo, and Jumbo, and the illustrations of many editions of the story contributed to this.  Recent retellings of the story have tried to capture the spirit of the tale while removing the racial stereotypes.

The Story of Little Babaji takes Bannerman’s original, and changes the names and details to match those of India.  Sambo becomes Babaji, Mumbo Mamaji, Jumbo, Dadaji.  The illustartions are Indian in detail as well.

Sam and the Tigers is a true retelling of the story by well known and respected African American author Julius Lester, and illustrated by African American illustrator Jerry Pinkney.  In this version, Sam lives in the land of Sam-sam-sa-mara, where everyone is named Sam, and animals and people live and work together.  In this story, Sam is witty and comical and the story maintains the essence of the original while managing to find its own voice.

It is my hope that libraries would have all three versions of the story to share with patrons so that they could see the evolution of the illustrations and the tale, and discuss the portrayal of African Americans, not only in this story, but in popular culture across time.

7 Responses to "Forgotten Book: Banned Books Week"

1 | Misrule

October 3rd, 2008 at 7:25 am

Avatar

Just a small, possibly pedantic, point: surely the depictions objected to in Bannerman’s original illustrated text were because of racial caricatures of people from Africa, not African Americans as such (Helen Bannerman was Scottish). It’s perhaps a small distinction, but the statement does suggest a US-centric view of the book, and objections to it on the grounds of racial stereotyping have not been confined to the USA.

2 | susan

October 3rd, 2008 at 10:17 am

Avatar

You are certainly right, in one sense, although I do believe that the first American editions had new illustrations from American illustrators. I did struggle with what term to use, I had tried several and changed it back and forth…

3 | Susan Theriault

October 3rd, 2008 at 11:20 am

Avatar

Little Black Sambo was one of my favorite books as a child in the fifties and early sixties. As with so many books of that era, there were exagerated stereotypes but these were not pointed out to me. I just loved the little book with the little drawings. Still dear to my heart is the idea of little purple shoes with crimson soles and crimson linings. I’m sure I didn’t know what that meant but it sounded very beautiful and exotic. I also remember believing that tigers chasing each other around a tree could actually go so fast that they could melt into butter (or ghi [ghee]- the author at least got that right.)
I know all the reasons why the book was revised but I don’t think any of the newer versions have the magic of the first one. Ditto for The Vovages of Dr. Doolittle, except that I understand why Patricia McKissack revised Prince Bumpo’s wish to be white into a wish to be a lion.
I was a children’s librarian for 25 years and am now a teen librarian and I read to my own children all the time, including the Peterkin Papers by Lucretia Hale, the Just So Stories by Rudyard Kipling and all the Winnie the Pooh books by A.A. Milne. (and many other classics, including the incredible sexism of Lois Lenski’s books about the Small family).
We always talked about how things have changed since those wonderful stories were written and why it’s different today. It was a great opportunity to share my values with my children so they COULD appreciate both excellent stories and the way in which things have changed for the better (usually). There are ways to present old stories so that children can learn about the evolution of change in attitudes without changing the words of the author. I am pretty much against any revision. Books reflect the times they were written in.

4 | Patti Abbott

October 3rd, 2008 at 11:25 am

Avatar

I loved this book as a child and I don’t think I gave the color of the children a second thought. It was just simple, sweet and fun.

5 | susan

October 3rd, 2008 at 11:35 am

Avatar

Susan–I agree, books do reflect the time they were written in, and discussion is the key for the most part. I loved the Peterkin Papers! Such a silly mixed up family! And Lois Lenski. I don’t think the sexism ever registered with me, although that perhaps had to do with the way I was raised, as I thought girls could do anything…It is when these books are read without any context or discussion that concerns could be raised…oh if only that were always possible. I too used to be a children’s librarian (and a teen librarian and an adult librarian involved in developing the fiction collection…)

Patti: That was how I remembered it as a child, but looking that the illustrations in the version I read, I can now see how stereotyped they were (are still.)

6 | Barrie Summy

October 4th, 2008 at 11:31 am

Avatar

I love your idea of having all versions available. Seems like it would be a great trampoline for discussion.

7 | Bookworms Carnival – Banned Books Week « The Novel World

September 28th, 2009 at 9:19 am

Avatar

[...] @ Read Space is also celebrated Banned Books Weeks by taking a look at Forgotten Books. [...]

Comment Form

About

We read books and then tell you about them!

Contact Susan for questions about review criteria or to set up an interview.

Contact Bonnie for questions about the website or suggestions for new content.